MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162874858 · doi:10.3386/w28784

Temporal Instability of Risk Preference among the Poor: Evidence from Payday Cycles

2021· preprint· en· W3162874858 on OpenAlexaff
Mika Akesaka, Peter Eibich, Chie Hanaoka, Hitoshi Shigeoka

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute on AgingJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of TokyoResearch Institute of Economy, Trade and IndustryUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsPreferenceInstabilityEnvironmental scienceStatisticsMathematicsPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The poor live paycheck to paycheck and are repeatedly exposed to strong cyclical income fluctuations.We investigate whether such income fluctuations affect risk preference among the poor.If risk preference temporarily changes around payday, optimal decisions made before payday may no longer be optimal afterward, which could reinforce poverty.By exploiting Social Security payday cycles in the US, we find that risk preference among the poor relying heavily on Social Security changes around payday.Rather than cognitive decline before payday, the deterioration of mental health and relative deprivation may play a role.We find similar evidence among the Japanese elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207