Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visual Art konseling merupakan salah satu Teknik dalam konseling seni yang memfokuskan pada visualisasi atau simbolisasi untuk mengungkapkan permasalahan konseli secara holistik yang dituangkan dalam menggambar, mewarnai, dan mematung (lilin). The American Art Therapy Association (dalam Hirawan, 2014) menjelaskan bahwa art therapy merupakan metode terapeutik yang menggunakan karya seni dengan hubungan profesional pada individu yang memiliki pengalaman menyakitkan (trauma) atau individu yang memiliki tantangan dalam hidupnya (Evi, 2017).Canadian Art Therapy Association (dalam Edwards, 2004) juga menjelaskan bahwa art therapy adalah bentuk psikoterapi yang memungkinkan sebagai bentuk ekspresi emosional dan penyembuhan melalui cara-cara nonverbal.Menurut Malchiodi (2005) seni visual merupakan konseling ekspresif. Melalui gambar dan lukisan dapat membantu individu mengekspresikan masalahnya. Bukan hal yang penting jika seseorang tidak mampu menggambar atau melukis dengan baik karena apa yang tergambarkan dan terlukiskan akan mencerminkan perasaan serta permasalahan yang sedang dihadapi oleh individu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.505 | 0.176 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".