An Attention-Seq2Seq Model Based on CRNN Encoding for Automatic Labanotation Generation from Motion Capture Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Labanotation is an important notation system widely used for recording dances. Numerous methods have been proposed for automatic Labanotation generation from motion capture data. Recently, the sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) model is proposed. However, the encoder of the model only encodes the temporal information of motion data, lacking the encoding for spatial information. And it is challenging for the decoder to align input and output sequences due to the imbalance of the sequence lengths. In this paper, we propose an attention-seq2seq model based on Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN). The proposed model employs an encoder based on CRNN to learn the spatial-temporal information of motion data and applies an attention mechanism to align each target Laban symbol with relevant parts of the input motion data in decoding. Experiments show that the proposed method performs favorably against state-of-the-art algorithms in the automatic Labanotation generation task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it