MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162971530 · doi:10.1126/science.abc7531

A prometastatic splicing program regulated by SNRPA1 interactions with structured RNA elements

2021· article· en· W3162971530 on OpenAlexafffund
Lisa Fish, Matvei Khoroshkin, Albertas Navickas, Kristle Garcia, Bruce Culbertson, Benjamin Hänisch, Steven Zhang, Hoang C.B. Nguyen, Larisa M. Soto, Maria Dermit, Faraz K. Mardakheh, Henrik Molina, Claudio R. Alarcón, Hamed S. Najafabadi, Hani Goodarzi

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome Centre
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of California, San FranciscoDOD Peer Reviewed Cancer Research ProgramNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San FranciscoCompute CanadaAmerican College of SurgeonsLangley Research CenterHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsRNA splicingRNAComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterizing a cancer spliceosome Cells undergo many genomic changes as they progress toward metastatic cancer. One aspect of this change is to RNA expression and splicing isoforms, but how these differences affect tumor progression is not well characterized. Fish et al. developed a computational framework called pyTEISER that identifies structural cis-regulatory elements that control diverse types of RNA regulation. Applying pyTEISER to models of breast cancer metastasis, they discovered an RNA short-stem-loop element that forms a “structural splicing enhancer” that acts in cis to regulate alternative splicing of RNA transcripts. One of these interactions encompasses the RNA-binding protein SNRPA1 and results in alternative exon inclusion that affects metastatic capacity in xenograft models. Thus, RNA element binding may play a role in splicing regulation and is potentially an important component of the cis-splicing code. Science , this issue p. eabc7531

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207