An Automated Tomato Maturity Grading System Using Transfer Learning Based AlexNet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomato maturity classification is the process that classifies the tomatoes based on their maturity by its life cycle. It is green in color when it starts to grow; at its pre-ripening stage, it is Yellow, and when it is ripened, its color is Red. Thus, a tomato maturity classification task can be performed based on the color of tomatoes. Conventional skill-based methods cannot fulfill modern manufacturing management's precise selection criteria in the agriculture sector since they are time-consuming and have poor accuracy. The automatic feature extraction behavior of deep learning networks is most efficient in image classification and recognition tasks. Hence, this paper outlines an automated grading system for tomato maturity classification in terms of colors (Red, Green, Yellow) using the pre-trained network, namely 'AlexNet,' based on Transfer Learning. This study aims to formulate a low-cost solution with the best performance and accuracy for Tomato Maturity Grading. The results are gathered in terms of Accuracy, Loss curves, and confusion matrix. The results showed that the proposed model outperforms the other deep learning and the machine learning (ML) techniques used by researchers for tomato classification tasks in the last few years, obtaining 100% accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".