Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Isumavut” foi o nome de uma exposição itinerante de arte contemporânca Inuit que circulou por algumas capitais brasileiras, em 2007 e 2008, apresentando ao público uma centena de gravuras, esculturas, pinturas e desenhos pertencentes ao Museu da Civilização do Canadá. Os trabalhos expostos retratavam a vida quotidiana, os mitos, as paisagens e as tradições ancestrais dos Iuuit, do ponto de vista de nove mulheres nativas. Tomando esse caso concreto como ponto de partida, o presente artigo proporá dois cixos de reflexão gerais sobre as artes contemporâneas autóctones: 1) à ênfase no passado e na tradição, em detrimento da mudança e da situação atual das populações; 2) a presença do gêncro enquanto recorte relevante para seu estudo. Além da exposição “Isumavut”, são apresentados três outros casos descritos pela literatura antropológica, que permitem estabelecer interconexões entre arte, identidade e gênero: a cerâmica Kariri-Xocó (Brasil), a arte Mangbetn (África) e os grafismos Bamana (África).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".