A Deep Spatio-Temporal Model for EEG-Based Imagined Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic speech recognition interfaces are becoming increasingly pervasive in daily life as a means of interacting with and controlling electronic devices. Current speech interfaces, however, are infeasible for a variety of users and use cases, such as patients who suffer from locked-in syndrome or those who need privacy. In these cases, an interface that works based on envisioned speech, the idea of imagining what one wants to say, could be of benefit. Consequently, in this work, we propose an imagined speech Brain-Computer-Interface (BCI) using Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. EEG signals are processed using a deep spatio-temporal learning architecture with 1D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), respectively. LSTM units are implemented in a many-to-many fashion to produce a time series of imagined speech outputs. Using this series, the performance of the system is boosted using majority vote (MV) post-processing to further improve results. The performance is evaluated on two publicly available datasets; one to test the performance of the tuned model, and another to test its generalization to a new dataset. The proposed architecture outperforms previous results with improvements of up to 23.7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".