MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163027366 · doi:10.52856/jcr311280113

The Financial Crises of 1929 and 2008: What Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Health Crisis?

2021· article· en· W3163027366 on OpenAlexaff
Donatien Avelé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Contemporary Research in Business Administration and Economic Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicWitnessReflection (computer programming)Financial crisis2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEconomicsReading (process)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceKeynesian economicsMedicineLawVirologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reading the history of economic and financial crises bears witness to the unprecedented and unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. To complete our reflection, we are discussing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in connection with macroeconomic instability. This short reflection answers the question of whether the lessons learned from the crises of the past can serve the major international financial players in the future

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.592
GPT teacher head0.585
Teacher spread0.007 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Contemporary Research in Business Administration and Economic SciencesSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207