MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kernel Orthogonal Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: Application to Multispectral Document Image Decomposition

2021· article· en· W3163082588 on OpenAlexaff
Abderrahmane Rahiche, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageMatrix decompositionKernel (algebra)Non-negative matrix factorizationDecompositionComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceFactorizationPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a nonlinear extension of the standard nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), kernel-based variants have demonstrated to be more effective for discovering meaningful latent features from raw data. However, many existing kernel methods allow only obtaining the basis matrix in the projected feature space, which prevents its inverse mapping back to the original space as requested in many applications. In this work, we propose a new kernel orthogonal NMF method that does not suffer from the pre-image issue. We incorporate the orthogonality constraint as an optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold to improve the sparsity and the model’s clustering properties. We solve the proposed model with an efficient optimization approach based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) scheme and the projected gradients method. We validate our model on the task of blind decomposition of real-world Multispectral (MS) document images. Our experiments demonstrate the competitiveness of our proposed model in comparison to the state-of-the-art techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207