Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problematic hypoglycemia is defined as a condition in which episodes of severe hypoglycemia are unpredictable and/or cannot be easily explained or prevented, typically associated with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. The treatment algorithm for patients with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycemia emphasizes the stepwise approach including structured education regarding multiple daily injections of insulin, use of technology such as sensor-augmented pump with low glucose suspension, and islet or pancreas transplantation. Although the prevalence of insulin independence at 5 years is 25~50% in most recent clinical trials of islet transplantation, both islet and pancreas transplantation are equally efficient to cure severe hypoglycemia for more than 5 years in about 70% of the recipients. To date, international cohorts of clinical islet transplantation such as the French-Swiss GRAGIL Network have successfully reproduced the long-term C-peptide positivity initially achieved with the Edmonton protocol, with long-term insulin independence demonstrated in selected cases. Several cases with partial islet graft function have been reported in Korea, with the first case of long-term insulin independence being reported in late 2015. Therefore, islet transplantation can offer freedom from life-threatening severe hypoglycemia for type 1 diabetes patients with problematic hypoglycemia, even in non-responders to the latest technology-based treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".