MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163136323 · doi:10.3390/polym13101622

Investigation on the Thermoforming of Pmsq-Hdpe for the Manufacture of a NACA Profile of Small Dimensions

2021· article· en· W3163136323 on OpenAlexafffund
Fouad Erchiqui, Abdessamad Baatti, Karima Ben Hamou, Hamid Kaddami, M’hamed Souli, A. Imad

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHigh-density polyethyleneMaterials scienceComposite materialViscoelasticityvon Mises yield criterionRheologyPolyethyleneFinite element methodStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones are attracting increasing interest in the aviation industry, both for military and civilian applications. The materials used so far in the manufacture of UAVs are wood, plastic, aluminum and carbon fiber. In this regard, a new family of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) nanocomposites reinforced with polymethylsilsesquioxane nanoparticles (PMSQ), with mechanical performances significantly superior to those of pure HPDE, has been prepared by a fusion-combination process. Their viscoelastic properties were determined by oscillatory shear tests and their viscoelastic behavior characterized by the Lodge integral model. Then, the Lagrangian formulation and the membrane theory assumption were used in the explicit implementation of the dynamic finite element formulation. For the forming phase, we considered the thermodynamic approach to express the external work in terms of closed volume. In terms of von Mises stress distribution and thickness in the blade, the results indicate that HDPE-PMSQ behaves like virgin HDPE. Furthermore, its materials, for all intents and purposes, require the same amount of energy to form as HDPE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymersSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207