Short-term intake of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> ZDY2013 fermented milk promotes homoeostasis of gut microbiota under enterotoxigenic <i>Bacillus cereus</i> challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Probiotics have long been used as functional starter cultures for fermented foods and are associated with numerous health benefits. Lactiplantibacillus (L.) plantarum ZDY2013 is an acid-tolerant probiotic candidate owning antagonistic properties against the food-borne pathogen Bacillus (B.) cereus and serves as a potent regulator of the gut microbiota. However, whether it retains these properties when used as dietary supplements in functional foods remains unknown. Accordingly, we investigated the ameliorating effects of L. plantarum fermented milk on disease phenotypes triggered by enterotoxigenic B. cereus in mice. The results revealed that administration of 3.0 × 108 cfu pathogenic B. cereus for one week induced damage to intestinal structures and bowel function, accompanied by an imbalance of gut microbiota. However, before or after B. cereus infection, oral administration of L. plantarum fermented milk mitigated losses of body weight and damage in the histological structure of the gastrointestinal tract, restored serum levels of IL-1β and IL-10, and contributed to significant decreases in platelet counts and uric acid levels. Most importantly, it restored the dissimilarity of gut microbiota and the abundance of bacterial taxa (i.e., reduced the abundance of Deferribacteres and Bacilli and increased the abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) without impacting the taxonomic composition. Combining these results, we speculate that enterotoxigenic B. cereus damages the intestinal epithelium and weakens its adherence capacity for the microbe, which is rescued by the supplementation of L. plantarum fermented milk. Overall, our findings revealed that L. plantarum ZDY2013 has the potential to be a fermented starter in functional foods and retains its antagonism against B. cereus pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".