MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Map style transfer using pixel-to-pixel model

2021· article· en· W3163187961 on OpenAlexaff
Weisheng Jin, Shihui Zhou, Luhao Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFocus (optics)PixelImage (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Process (computing)Task (project management)Generator (circuit theory)Computer visionTransfer (computing)Transfer of learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The image style transfer is a well-known task and it is applied commonly in the field of artificial intelligence, which converts an image to an image with a specific style without modifying the image content and can be applied to many fields such as changing styled automatically for photos in the cellphone and map wrapping. Recent works focus on a general image style transfer. In this paper, we aim to solve the problem in a navigation application, which is to transfer the satellite maps into map images automatically by deep learning techniques. The methodology we choose for this project is a special GAN named pix2pix model. We decide to use the satellite images as our inputs for the model and let the corresponding Google map images be the output sources. Similar to a traditional GAN, we train the discriminator and generator simultaneously and we attempt to run the training process for 50 epochs in total. PNSR and SSIM are two features we are going to use to test the performance of our results. Finally, the accuracy needs to be improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207