MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163199723 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-494087/v1

Application of Mechanistic Force Models to Features of Arbitrary Geometry at Low Material Removal Rate

2021· preprint· en· W3163199723 on OpenAlexafffund
Grael Miller, Rishad A. Irani, Mojtaba Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiscretizationMachiningChamfer (geometry)Nonlinear systemExponential functionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGeometryMathematicsMechanicsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringMathematical analysisEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a workpiece discretization method to apply existing cutting force models to predict the forces generated during low material removal rate robotic machining operations of features with arbitrary geometry. Two machining operations along a straight edge are modelled using this feature discretization method are shown, a chamfer pass on a sharp corner and the removal of a trapezoidal cross section. The workpiece features are measured using a high resolution laser profile scanner to obtain the volume of the features to be removed. The identified features are discretized into rectangular sections such that the cutting force models can be applied to predict the cutting forces. A linear and an exponential mechanistic model which relate tool immersion and feed rate to the cutting force are applied to the scanned workpiece features. The linear and nonlinear models show good agreement with the measured data, with the exception that the linear model occasionally over predicts the forces depending on the radial depth of cut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207