MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3163241359 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-2391

Deformation mechanisms in naturally-deformed blueschist facies metabasalts: constraints from exhumed subduction complexes in Greece and California

2021· article· en· W3163241359 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Tewksbury‐Christle, Alissa Kotowski, Whitney Behr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlueschistGeologySubductionGlaucophaneGeochemistrySchistShear zoneOutcropEclogiteGreenschistPetrologyMetamorphic rockSeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The strength, or viscosity, of the subduction interface is a key parameter in subduction dynamics, influencing both long-term subduction plate speeds and short-term transient deformation styles. Fossil subduction interfaces exhumed from downdip of the megathrust record ductile deformation accommodated by diverse lithologies, including metasedimentary and metamafic rocks. Existing flow laws for quartz-rich rocks predict relatively low viscosities, in contrast to high viscosities predicted for basalt and eclogite, but the rheological properties of blueschists representative of metamorphosed oceanic crust of the down-going slab are poorly constrained. Two key questions remain: 1) are there significant viscosity contrasts between blueschists and quartz- or mica-rich metasedimentary rocks, and 2) what are the microscale mechanisms for creep in naturally deformed blueschists and how do they vary with pressure and temperature? To address these questions, we characterized deformation in natural samples from the Condrey Mountain Schist (CMS) in northern California, USA, and the Cycladic Blueschist Unit (CBU) on Syros Island, Cyclades, Greece, using outcrop-scale structural observations, optical microscopy, and Electron Backscatter Diffraction. The CMS and CBU record pressure-temperature conditions of 0.8-1.1 GPa, 350-450°C and 1.4-1.8 GPa, 450-550°C, respectively. In the field, blueschists form m- to km-scale lenses that are interfolded with quartz schists, ultramafics, and, in the CBU, eclogites and marbles. At the outcrop scale in both localities, quartz-rich schists and blueschists each exhibit strong foliations and lineations and planar contacts at lithological boundaries. At the thin section scale, the prograde foliation and mineral lineation in blueschists are commonly defined by Na-amphiboles elongated in the lineation direction. Crystallographic preferred orientations in Na-amphibole in all samples have c-axes parallel to lineation and a-axes predominantly defining point-maxima perpendicular to the foliation, suggesting some component of dislocation activity for all temperature conditions in our sample suite. Microtextures in lower temperature CMS samples suggest strain accommodation primarily by dislocation glide and kinking in Na-amphibole, with extremely high-aspect-ratio grains and limited evidence for climb-controlled dynamic recrystallization. Some higher temperature CBU samples show large porphyroclasts with apparent ‘core-and-mantle’-type recrystallization textures and subgrain orientation analyses consistent with the (hk0)[001] slip systems. In contrast, epidote grains accommodate less strain than Na-amphibole, via some combination of rigid rotation, brittle boudinage, and minor intracrystalline plasticity. Observations of evenly-distributed strain, despite lithological heterogeneity, suggest low viscosity contrasts and comparable bulk strengths of quartz schists and blueschists. Our microstructural observations suggest that Na-amphibole was the weakest phase and accommodated the majority of strain in mafic blueschists. Dislocation activity, and not just rigid-body-rotation or diffusional processes, accommodated some component of strain and possibly transitioned with increasing temperature from glide- to climb-controlled. Although effective viscosities appear to be similar, subduction interface shear zones dominated by blueschists may exhibit a power-law rheology consistent with dislocation activity, in contrast to the common inference of Newtonian creep in metasediments. Complementary experimental work on CMS and CBU rocks will also be presented at this meeting (see Tokle et al. and Hufford et al.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→