L’Album NRF de François Nourissier dans les Albums de la Pléiade : patrimonialisation et célébration éditoriale1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Albums de la Pléiade sont une série de monographies illustrées destinées à la promotion de la célèbre collection patrimoniale, la Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Alors que la fonction publicitaire des Albums est généralement atténuée par son éditeur, Gallimard, un tome de la collection, l’Album NRF, déroge à cette règle en ce qu’il relève ouvertement de l’autopromotion éditoriale. Cet article se propose d’examiner quels moyens discursifs et médiatiques sont mis en oeuvre au sein du volume afin de véhiculer une image de la NRF en tant qu’institution au rôle crucial dans l’histoire littéraire. Finalement, nous regardons comment Gallimard procède à la patrimonialisation de son propre comptoir d’édition à la faveur du médium de la collection et de l’aura dont bénéficie la Pléiade au sein du paysage littéraire de notre temps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".