MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163252418 · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac150e

Tightest bound on hidden entropy production from partially observed dynamics

2021· article· en· W3163252418 on OpenAlexaff
Jannik Ehrich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservableNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsStatistical physicsEntropy productionUpper and lower boundsMarkov processMarkov chainEntropy (arrow of time)Formalism (music)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Stochastic thermodynamics allows us to define heat and work for microscopic systems far from thermodynamic equilibrium, based on observations of their stochastic dynamics. However, a complete account of the energetics necessitates that all relevant nonequilibrium degrees of freedom are resolved, which is not feasible in many experimental situations. A simple approach is to map the visible dynamics onto a Markov model, which produces a lower-bound estimate of the entropy production. The bound, however, can be quite loose, especially when the visible dynamics only have small or vanishing observable currents. An alternative approach is presented that uses all observable data to find an underlying hidden Markov model responsible for generating the observed non-Markovian dynamics. For masked Markovian kinetic networks, one obtains the tightest possible lower bound on entropy production of the full dynamics that is compatible with the observable data. The formalism is illustrated with a simple example system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and ExperimentSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207