MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163268953 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.12924

Development, characterisation, and deployment of the SNO+ liquid scintillator

2020· article· en· W3163268953 on OpenAlexaff
Mark R. Anderson, S. Andringa, Luciano Anselmo, E. Arushanova, S. Asahi, M. Askins, D. J. Auty, H.O. Back, Z. Barnard, N. Barros, D. T. Bartlett, F. Barão, R. Bayes, E. W. Beier, A. Białek, S. D. Biller, R. Bonventre, M. G. Boulay, D. Braid, E. Caden, J. Caravaca Rodríguez, J. Carvalho, Luca Cavalli, D. Chauhan, M. Chen, O. Chkvorets, Kenneth Clark, B. T. Cleveland, D. Cookman, C. Connors, I. T. Coulter, M. A. Cox, David Cressy, X. Dai, C. Darrach, B. Davis-Purcell, C. Deluce, M. M. Depatie, F. Descamps, J. Dittmer, F. Di Lodovico, N. Duhaime, F. A. Duncan, Jack Dunger, A. Earle, D. Fabris, E. Falk, A. Farrugia, N. Fatemighomi, V. Fischer, E.R. Fletcher, R. Ford, K. Frankiewicz, N. Gagnon, A. Gaur, K. Gilje, O. I. González-Reina, D. Gooding, P. Gorel, K. Graham, C. Grant, J. E. Grove, S. Grullon, E. Guillian, S. Hall, A. L. Hallin, D. Hallman, S. Hans, J. Hartnell, P. J. Harvey, M. Hedayatipour, W. J. Heintzelman, J. Heise, R. L. Helmer, D. F. Horne, B. Hreljac, Jun Hu, T. Iida, A. S. Inácio, C. M. Jackson, N.A. Jelley, C. Jillings, C. L. Jones, P. Jones, K. Kamdin, T. Kaptanoglu, J. Kašpar, K. Keeter, C. Kéfélian, P. Khaghani, L. Kippenbrock, J. Klein, R. Knapik, J. Kofron, L. L. Kormos, Simon Korte, B. Krar

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFLaurentian UniversityUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorLinear alkylbenzeneMaterials scienceYield (engineering)SolventLiquid scintillation countingDetectorOpticsPhysicsRadiochemistryChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A liquid scintillator consisting of linear alkylbenzene as the solvent and 2,5-diphenyloxazole as the fluor was developed for the SNO+ experiment. This mixture was chosen as it is compatible with acrylic and has a competitive light yield to pre-existing liquid scintillators while conferring other advantages including longer attenuation lengths, superior safety characteristics, chemical simplicity, ease of handling, and logistical availability. Its properties have been extensively characterized and are presented here. This liquid scintillator is now used in several neutrino physics experiments in addition to SNO+.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207