Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les précédents commentateurs ont eu tendance à traiter “Amundsen”, nouvelle figurant dans le recueil Dear Life (2012) d’Alice Munro, comme une histoire d’amour formellement organisée à partir d’archétypes traditionnels. La présente approche se veut plus originale en mettant en évidence les spécificités géographiques et historiques du récit, qui permettent de la situer non seulement dans l’Ontario des années 1940, mais aussi dans l’histoire du traitement de la tuberculose et de ses institutions. L’analyse de plusieurs volets du récit montre que le souhait de discipliner donne lieu une obéissance presque masochiste et auto-policée. Ce que l’on pourrait lire de prime abord comme une histoire d’amour apparaît, de manière plus crédible, comme l’histoire d’un traumatisme qui laisse la narratrice vide, détachée et incapable d’apprendre quoi que ce soit de l’expérience amère qu’elle raconte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".