Aprendizaje-servicio y formación inicial docente. Factores que determinan el desarrollo de habilidades transversales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Service-learning experiences bolster the acquisition of disciplinary knowledge and promote the development of transversal skills such as confidence, leadership, commitment and social justice. This study investigates the development of transversal skills through courses using the service-learning methodology. The qualitative research designed and validated a semi-structured interview and a focus group, involving 20 and 8 student teachers respectively, who were selected by accidental non-probabilistic sampling. Open coding was used to analyse the information collected. The findings show that the factors that bolster the development of skills during service-learning experiences are linked to the students' prior knowledge and the way in which they connect this knowledge to the experience; the opportunities presented to the students depending on the length of the experience, the characteristics of the context and the pedagogical support received, as well as the processes the students engaged with during the service, together with the spaces for participation and involvement that the practical experience included. The paper discusses and draw conclusions on how the presence or absence of any of these elements will affect the development of skills during the service-learning experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".