Parents’ and teachers’ ratings of family engagement: Congruence and prediction of outcomes.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
= 122). Academic outcomes were directly assessed. Parents and teachers showed high levels of agreement in their perceptions of home-school communication, school-based involvement, and parent-teacher trust. Parents' educational background moderated the level of agreement for school-based involvement between parents and teachers. Parents and teachers reported higher levels of involvement for parents with higher educational levels; however, the differences in involvement levels were greater between parents from higher and lower educational backgrounds when using teacher ratings versus parent ratings. Positive associations between parents' and teachers' ratings of all engagement types were small to moderate. Higher levels of parent-teacher trust predicted lower levels of parent and teacher-reported externalizing behavior. Discrepancies in parents' and teachers' ratings of school-based involvement predicted lower internalizing symptoms for children. Findings replicated research suggesting positive associations between parental engagement and children's behavioral/academic functioning, while also expanding the limited understanding of how parent-teacher agreement regarding family engagement predict outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it