MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163516971 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.14.444217

Mammary lineage dictates homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitor vulnerability

2021· preprint· en· W3163516971 on OpenAlexaff
H Kim, Alison E. Casey, Luís Palomero, Kazeera Aliar, Mathepan Mahendralingam, Michael T. Parsons, Swami Narala, Francesca Mateo, Stefan O.P. Hofer, Paul Waterhouse, Thomas Kislinger, Miguel Ángel Pujana, Hal K. Berman, Rama Khokha

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRAD51Homologous recombinationBiologyDNA repairLineage (genetic)Homologous chromosomePoly ADP ribose polymeraseCancer researchCell biologyDNABRCA2 ProteinPARP inhibitorNon-homologous end joiningDNA damageMolecular biologyGeneticsGenePolymeraseMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has long been assumed that all normal cells have the same capacity to engage homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a concept exploited for DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics. We show that mammary epithelial lineage dictates the DSB repair pathway choice. Primary mammary proteomes and DSB repair enumeration by γ-H2AX, Rad51 and DNA-PKc foci reveal that NHEJ operates in all epithelial cells, but high-fidelity HR is restricted to the luminal lineage. This translates to divergent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) vulnerability of mammary epithelial progenitor activity in both mouse and human, irrespective of the BRCA1/2 status. Proteome-defined lineage-specific signatures correlate to breast cancer subtypes and predict PARPi response of triple-negative human breast cancer xenografts. These intrinsically divergent HR characteristics of mammary cell types underpin a new strategy for identifying PARPi responders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207