MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163533747 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00980-6

Priorities for COVID-19 research response and preparedness in low-resource settings

2021· article· en· W3163533747 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alice Norton, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Jean Marie Vianney Habarugira, Nicholas John White, Marta Tufet, Hans-Eckhardt Hagen, Julie Archer, Moses Alobo, Gail Carson, Patricia García, Rui M. B. Maciel, Uma Ramakrishnan, Choong‐Min Ryu, Helen Rees, Francine Ntoumi, Akhona Tshangela, Mohammad Abul Faiz, Valerie A. Snewin, Sheila Mburu, Rachel Elizabeth Esther Miles, Brenda Okware, Richard Vaux, Stefanie Sowinski, Caesar Atuire, Charu Kaushic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Health and Social CareMedical Research CouncilAlliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in AfricaDirectorate for Biological SciencesCochrane South AfricaNational Centre for Biological SciencesAfrican Union CommissionDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiativeUK Research and InnovationFondation MérieuxCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBill and Melinda Gates FoundationAfrican UnionKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and BiotechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungInstitute of Infection and ImmunityFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAfrican Academy of SciencesUniversity of GhanaSouth African Medical Research CouncilCanton de GenèveForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeUniversity of OxfordMahidol UniversityDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentEuropean Commission
KeywordsPreparednessCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Context (archaeology)Global healthSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPandemicEbola virusMedicineHealth careResource (disambiguation)DiseasePublic relationsPolitical sciencePublic healthVirologyComputer scienceNursingInfectious disease (medical specialty)GeographyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.083
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.156
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0830.156
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0290.014
Open science0.0090.029
Research integrity0.0210.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207