MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163582535 · doi:10.1149/2.001011if

From the Editor: Global Warming – A Real Issue

2001· article· en· W3163582535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Krishnan Rajeshwar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electrochemical Society Interface · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicClimate Change Policy and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKyoto ProtocolTreatyGlobal warmingOpposition (politics)Greenhouse gasMontreal ProtocolNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse effectPolitical scienceInternational tradeAtmosphere (unit)Climate changeMeteorologyBusinessEconomicsLawGeographyGeologyOzone layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back in 1997, more than 84 countries signed the Kyoto protocol, a treaty intended to cut anthropogenic releases of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In the ensuing years, opposition to this treaty has steadily grown, fueled in part by (a) scientific uncertainty as to whether global warming is real and whether humans are really contributing to the problem; (b) the notion that emission cutbacks will thwart economic progress; and (c) concerns about how the proposed limits on emissions are to be enforced in an equitable manner on developed versus developing countries on a worldwide basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Electrochemical Society InterfaceSame topicClimate Change Policy and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207