MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163598940 · doi:10.3917/ela.201.0106

L’utilisateur au cœur de la démarche lexicographique d’ Usito

2021· article· fr· W3163598940 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Cajolet-Laganière

Bibliographic record

VenueÉla Études de linguistique appliquée · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article a pour but de montrer le rôle joué par le public cible, notamment par l’utilisateur, dans les choix éditoriaux du dictionnaire en ligne Usito , dans la description de la langue, de même que dans l’enrichissement et la mise à jour du dictionnaire. Il illustre également comment le dictionnaire est centré sur l’utilisateur, entre autres éléments, par la vulgarisation des données (infobulles et remarques explicatives, tolérance à l’erreur, fonctionnalités conviviales, etc.) et à l’écoute de celui-ci par l’intégration dans le dictionnaire de réponses à ses questions ou commentaires. Grâce à sa plateforme informatique, nous entrons dans l’univers d’un dictionnaire renouvelé profitant des avantages des technologies nouvelles et pouvant s’adapter à la diversité francophone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉla Études de linguistique appliquéeSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207