L’utilisateur au cœur de la démarche lexicographique d’ Usito
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article a pour but de montrer le rôle joué par le public cible, notamment par l’utilisateur, dans les choix éditoriaux du dictionnaire en ligne Usito , dans la description de la langue, de même que dans l’enrichissement et la mise à jour du dictionnaire. Il illustre également comment le dictionnaire est centré sur l’utilisateur, entre autres éléments, par la vulgarisation des données (infobulles et remarques explicatives, tolérance à l’erreur, fonctionnalités conviviales, etc.) et à l’écoute de celui-ci par l’intégration dans le dictionnaire de réponses à ses questions ou commentaires. Grâce à sa plateforme informatique, nous entrons dans l’univers d’un dictionnaire renouvelé profitant des avantages des technologies nouvelles et pouvant s’adapter à la diversité francophone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".