MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163681195 · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00933-4

In vivo adenine base editing of PCSK9 in macaques reduces LDL cholesterol levels

2021· article· en· W3163681195 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja Rothgangl, Melissa K. Dennis, Paulo J.C. Lin, Rurika Oka, Dominik Witzigmann, Lukas Villiger, Weihong Qi, Martina Hruzova, Lucas Kissling, Daniela Lenggenhager, Costanza Borrelli, Sabina Egli, Nina Frey, Noëlle Bakker, John Walker, Anastasia P. Kadina, Denis V. Victorov, Martin Pačesa, Susanne Kreutzer, Zacharias Kontarakis, Andreas E. Moor, Martin Jínek, Drew Weissman, Markus Stoffel, Ruben van Boxtel, Kevin Holden, Norbert Pardi, Beat Thöny, Johannes Häberle, Ying K. Tam, Sean C. Semple, Gerald Schwank

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsAcuitas Therapeutics (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPCSK9ClearanceIn vivoPoint mutationBiologyMessenger RNALipoproteinCholesterolRNALDL receptorMutationMolecular biologyImmunologyMedicineGeneEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most known pathogenic point mutations in humans are C•G to T•A substitutions, which can be directly repaired by adenine base editors (ABEs). In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of ABEs in the livers of mice and cynomolgus macaques for the reduction of blood low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. Lipid nanoparticle-based delivery of mRNA encoding an ABE and a single-guide RNA targeting PCSK9, a negative regulator of LDL, induced up to 67% editing (on average, 61%) in mice and up to 34% editing (on average, 26%) in macaques. Plasma PCSK9 and LDL levels were stably reduced by 95% and 58% in mice and by 32% and 14% in macaques, respectively. ABE mRNA was cleared rapidly, and no off-target mutations in genomic DNA were found. Re-dosing in macaques did not increase editing, possibly owing to the detected humoral immune response to ABE upon treatment. These findings support further investigation of ABEs to treat patients with monogenic liver diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations377
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207