MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163725645 · doi:10.2140/gt.2023.27.1635

Classifying sufficiently connected PSC manifoldsin 4 and 5 dimensions

2023· article· en· W3163725645 on OpenAlexafffund
Otis Chodosh, Chao Li, Yevgeny Liokumovich

Bibliographic record

VenueGeometry & Topology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsScalar curvatureMathematicsPrescribed scalar curvature problemManifold (fluid mechanics)Metric (unit)Cover (algebra)HomotopyCurvatureDimension (graph theory)Covering spaceRiemannian manifoldCombinatoricsScalar (mathematics)Closed manifoldPure mathematicsSectional curvatureGeometryInvariant manifold

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that if N is a closed manifold of dimension n D 4 (resp.n D 5) with 2 .N / D 0 (resp. 2 .N / D 3 .N / D 0) that admits a metric of positive scalar curvature, then a finite cover y N of N is homotopy equivalent to S n or connected sums of S n 1 S 1 .Our approach combines recent advances in the study of positive scalar curvature with a novel argument of Alpert, Balitskiy and Guth.Additionally, we prove a more general mapping version of this result.In particular, this implies that if N is a closed manifold of dimensions 4 or 5, and N admits a map of nonzero degree to a closed aspherical manifold, then N does not admit any Riemannian metric with positive scalar curvature.53C21

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeometry & TopologySame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207