Two-step machine learning method for the rapid analysis of microvascular flow in intravital video microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microvascular blood flow is crucial for tissue and organ function and is often severely affected by diseases. Therefore, investigating the microvasculature under different pathological circumstances is essential to understand the role of the microcirculation in health and sickness. Microvascular blood flow is generally investigated with Intravital Video Microscopy (IVM), and the captured images are stored on a computer for later off-line analysis. The analysis of these images is a manual and challenging process, evaluating experiments very time consuming and susceptible to human error. Since more advanced digital cameras are used in IVM, the experimental data volume will also increase significantly. This study presents a new two-step image processing algorithm that uses a trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to functionally analyze IVM microscopic images without the need for manual analysis. While the first step uses a modified vessel segmentation algorithm to extract the location of vessel-like structures, the second step uses a 3D-CNN to assess whether the vessel-like structures have blood flowing in it or not. We demonstrate that our two-step algorithm can efficiently analyze IVM image data with high accuracy (83%). To our knowledge, this is the first application of machine learning for the functional analysis of microvascular blood flow in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".