Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The acceleration and transport of high-latitude ionospheric ion outflows, both bulk ion flows and suprathermal ion outflows, play a fundamental role in magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling. Bulk ion flows consist mainly of the polar wind and auroral bulk upflows (with flow energies up to a few eV) in the topside polar ionosphere, which are the primary sources of low-energy H + and O + ions, respectively, for various ion acceleration processes at higher altitudes. These processes include perpendicular and parallel acceleration in the mid (~1000–5000 km) or high-altitude auroral zone, which produce suprathermal (~10 eV to ~10 keV) ion outflows such as transversely accelerated ions, ion conics, and ion beams; and centrifugal acceleration in regions of curved or changing magnetic field at high altitudes (above ~3–4 R E ). A significant fraction of ion outflows remains cold in the magnetosphere, where their transport is strongly influenced by the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and the prevailing convection electric field. This results in a preferential feeding of the dusk plasma sheet under duskward IMF, and a stronger transport to the plasma sheet compared to the magnetotail at times of strong convection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it