The Scope of Wildlife Rehabilitation in Canada with a Focus on Lead Toxicosis in Trumpeter Swans (Cygnus buccinator)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reasons that wildlife are brought to wildlife rehabilitation centres across Canada have not been documented from coast to coast. However, it is well-known that humans have both direct and indirect impacts on wildlife. But just how pervasive are human impacts on wildlife across Canada? How have hunting and fishing activities affected wild birds in Ontario, specifically trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator)? And how can we diagnose some health issues in wild birds, specifically lead toxicity, given constraints of laboratory testing parameters? Understanding human impacts on wildlife can give wildlife biologists, rehabilitators, or government officials the information that could help develop potential mitigation strategies to help ensure wildlife health. This research considers such issues related to wildlife in three areas: (1) understanding the reasons why wild animals are admitted to wildlife rehabilitation centres across Canada, specifically as it relates to anthropogenic impacts; (2) surveying the level of lead in the blood of free-ranging, wild trumpeter swans in Ontario; and (3) determining the reliability of a point-of-care blood lead analyzer for blood samples that have been sitting for more than six days after the manufacturer’s recommended blood analysis test has been run. In the first research area, analysis of more than 21,000 patient records from three wildlife rehabilitation centres across Canada demonstrated that up to 97% of wild animals brought into wildlife rehabilitation centres are thought to be directly or indirectly linked to anthropogenic causes. In the second research area, blood samples from 95 trumpeter swans in Ontario, Canada revealed blood lead levels above 3.2 µg/dL in 90% of the birds, with 30% of the swans having blood lead levels exceeding 15 µg/dL. These data show that lead toxicosis remains a concern for the health and welfare of trumpeter swans in Ontario because of the environmental persistence of lead. The third research area results indicated that whole blood from trumpeter and mute swans can be stored in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood collection tubes for up to seven days at 4º Celsius while maintaining accuracy in blood lead level results analyzed from a point of care blood lead level system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".