MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of a treatment protocol for intramammary infections in early postpartum dairy cows based on a positive California Mastitis Test result

2004· article· en· W3163943497 on OpenAlexafffund
Jodi Ann Wallace, Korana Stipetić, Y.H. Schukken, R.T. Dingwell, Paul Baillargeon, K.E. Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Bovine Practitioner · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of GuelphSonaca (Canada)
FundersDairy Farmers of OntarioUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsMastitisUdderIce calvingHerdMedicineCalifornia mastitis testSomatic cell countVeterinary medicineAnimal scienceLactationDairy cattleBacteriologyPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have evaluated the use of the California Mastitis Test (CMT) in early postpartum cows to identify intramammary infections (IMI). Whether the CMT is used to identify cows for culture or for herd-level udder health monitoring, many producers are in a dilemma when faced with a positive CMT result. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intramammary treatment protocol based on a positive CMT result within the first three days of calving. In addition, the effect of early intramammary antibiotic therapy on cure rates, linear somatic cell score (LS) and milk production for the first three Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) tests postcalving were assessed. A total of 1861 quarters, representing 561 cows from 24 commercial herds, were enrolled. All quarters from each cow were tested by the dairy producer using the CMT, and sampled aseptically for milk bacteriology between calving and three days-in-milk (DIM). Cows with a positive CMT (n=180) were randomly assigned to receive either intramammary (IMM) cephapirin sodium, or no treatment. A CMT with any reaction was considered positive. All CMT-positive cows were sampled for bacteriological culture between 10-16 DIM to determine cure of infections. Cure rates were evaluated using data from 138 treated and 117 control quarters. Cure rates for all major pathogens for the treated and control group were 84.6 and 71.7%, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. However, cure rates for environmental streptococcal infections for the treated and control group, 89.4 and 70.82%, respectively, were statistically different (P=0.05). Cows that recovered from infection with a major pathogen had a decrease in linear score. As LS decreased, milk production increased. When milk production was evaluated, it was demonstrated that as the CMT score increased, cows had a 2.1-kg decrease in milk production per test date. The antibiotic treatment groups were not significantly different for LS or milk production by the third test date. In conclusion, this fresh cow protocol was most effective to reduce IMI due to environmental streptococci and reduce LS. Therefore, blanket therapy of all CMT-positive cows may not be justified. Udder health status and predominant mastitis pathogen within the herd need to be considered when developing treatment protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Bovine PractitionerSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207