Bibliographic record
Abstract
본 연구는 유아교육 역사를 통해서 본 물질성에 대한 탐구로서 신유물론(New materialism)을 바탕으로 유아교육의 선구자들의 철학에 드러난 물질성을 감각놀이/교육을 중심으로 분석하였다. 이 연구는 현대 유아교육에서 놀이와 체화된 교육의 의미를 재고찰하기 위해 역사적 관점과 통합적 문헌연구를 적용하여 진행하였다. 본 저자는 플라톤부터 패티 스미스 힐에 이르는 선구자들의 철학에 드러난 물질성에 대해 추적하였으며, 신유물론의 관점에서 그 물질성이 주는 의미와 제한점을 분석하여 제시하였다. 이것을 바탕으로 현재 교육현장에줄 수 있는 적용방안도 함께 논의하였다.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".