MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163992160 · doi:10.1017/9781800101876.003

Decolonial and Indigenous Curatorial Theory and Practice in Brazil

2021· other· en· W3163992160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPractice theoryIndigenous cultureGeographySociologyAnthropologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moving on from the introduction to the appearance of Indigenous contemporary and contemporary Indigenous visual art discussed in Chapter 1, the current chapter focuses specifically on debates in Brazil around decolonial and Indigenous curatorship, as well as discussing related exhibitions, both in major art institutions, Indigenous community-based museums and other pop-up events. It then goes on to propose a set of ‘decolonizing methodologies’, in Māori scholar Linda Tuhiwai Smith's terms, for the exhibition of Indigenous art that can help us to see how Indigenous curatorial agency might function in an exhibition, using examples from the ‘British’ (post)colonial settler world in the first instance before contextualising those methodologies as they might be said to occur in the context of Brazil. It should be noted, before proceeding, that this choice to contextualise and gain critical leverage via the study of examples from the ‘British’ (post)colonial settler world has been selected not because Brazilian Indigenous contemporary art is derivative of, or particularly inspired by, this context, but that, given the thriving Indigenous contemporary, and particularly electronic, art scene in countries such as Canada, this approach can offer useful examples of Indigenous curatorial practice that are largely lacking elsewhere. DECOLONIAL CURATORIAL THEORY AND PRACTICE IN BRAZIL Given that, as Anishinaabe-Ojibwe scholar Sonya Atalay underscores, ‘Museums, collecting, anthropology, and archaeology were developed within, and are deeply entrenched in, a Western episte-mological framework and have histories that are strongly colonial in nature’ (597), the curatorship of exhibitions of Indigenous artefacts in hegemonic institutions needs to be handled extremely carefully in order to start to provoke the decolonisation of those institutions rather than shore up the status quo. The same can be said of the exhibition of Indigenous art in mainstream art galleries. A discourse around the possibility of decolonisation and the nature of decoloniality has been circulating since the beginning of the twenty-first century in Latin American(ist) circles and constitutes one of the most significant and complex philosophical challenges to dominant currents of thought to come out of the field of Latin American Studies. Most notably, these thinkers seek to move beyond theorisations of postcolonialism that, in their view, do not sufficiently address the ongoing ‘coloniality of power’, in Aníbal Quijano's terms, that con-tinues to structure all aspects of life in places that have experienced colonialism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.036
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Cultures and HistoryFrench-language works237,207