MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164021125 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2021.3082810

Artificial Noise Assisted In-Band Full-Duplex Secure Channel Estimation

2021· article· en· W3164021125 on OpenAlex
Fawad Ud Din, Fabrice Labeau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceTransmitterArtificial noiseNode (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)Transmitter power outputBit error rateInterference (communication)Computer networkElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel secure channel estimation technique to provide security against leakage of the channel estimates to any malicious user by utilizing artificial noise (AN) along with full-duplex (FD) transmissions. AN overcomes the drawback of FD transmission, where any strategically located eavesdropper can minimize the interference signal received from the FD receiver. The proposed secure channel estimation technique comprises three stages, where the first stage is responsible for the estimation of the residual self-interference (SI) channel. The second stage acquires rough channel estimates to design AN orthogonal to the channel between legitimate transmitter-receiver for the next training stage. In the third stage, both legitimate nodes transmit orthogonal AN signals along with the known training signals using FD transmissions. For power allocation, we have presented a novel local adaptive power allocation algorithm at each legitimate node to allocate the powers to the training signals, and AN signals while ensuring equivocation at the eavesdropper. We provide the mean square error (MSE) to indicate the performance achieved by the respective nodes. We have also provided the bit error rate (BER) simulation analysis to indicate the secure communication achieved by securing the channel estimation process. The presented simulation analysis indicates that the eavesdropper is unable to decode the transmitted information while the legitimate receiver has robustly decoded the transmitted information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it