Viajeros europeos y sus motivaciones para visitar Ecuador en el siglo XIX: European travelers and their motivations to visit Ecuador in the 19th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nineteenth century was characterized by the emergence of new material, political, demographic and intellectual forces that would have prompted the realization of trips around the world. Also, incursions into inhospitable territories as a step towards the New Continent which has marked history, and has left extensive compiled on stories of experiences, feelings, journeys, points of view and impressions of travelers. This article aims to identify the motivations of travelers from France, Germany, Spain and England to Ecuador in the 19th century. For this purpose, a retrospective analysis was carried out based on the deep bibliographic review of primary and secondary sources in national bibliographic repositories as of the countries in question. This, to subsequently proceed to schematize that information in summary matrices. Besides of motivation, registration of personal data of each traveler, so nationality as well as occupation were noted, to finally achieve a segmentation of six types of motivation of own elaboration. Preliminary results, after six months of work, indicate that majority of travelers moved for work reasons, following a collective feature of knowing places described as exotic; and then a thought of the epoch influenced by the desire to explore “the other Likewise, travelers stand out for motivated academics, for science, for art, diplomacy, for commerce, emissaries of scientists, collectors of natural specimens and even accidental visits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".