The Role of Field Survey in the Identification of Farmland Abandonment in Slovakia Using Sentinel-2 Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agricultural land abandonment is a dynamic process characterized by both significant spectral variability and spectral similarity to areas of agricultural land. The identification of abandoned agricultural land (AAL) based on remote sensing data must be preceded by field surveys that are focused on the acquisition of the physiognomic characteristics (the composition of species, height of vegetation, textures, and clustering into patterns) of these areas. This study aims to document the physiognomic and spectral differences between AAL and other land cover/land use classes in Slovakia. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), derived from Sentinel-2 time series for vegetation from April to September 2018, was applied. NDVI values were calculated for each Sentinel-2 scene, and NDVI profiles for selected samples were used to create phenological profiles for each AAL and land cover/land use class. The dispersion of the NDVI values for these classes, their median, and the root mean square error between NDVI data show that overgrowth by herbaceous plants is characterized by more significant dynamics (0.40–0.75), resulting in better spectral discriminability than classes overgrown by shrubs and trees (0.70–0.80). Field survey data are a fundamental prerequisite for the correct explanation of the discriminability of these AAL classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".