A New Model for the Genesis of Carboniferous Mn Ores, Longtou Deposit, South China Block
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The lower Carboniferous Luzhai and Baping Formations (ca. 359 Ma) of the South China block, Guangxi Province, comprise an ca. 170-m-thick clastic-carbonate succession capped by Mn ore horizons near the town of Longtou. Excellent exposure of the stratigraphic succession provides an unparalleled opportunity to investigate the origin of carbonate-hosted Mn deposits, which are generally understudied. Lithofacies associations suggest inner and middle shelf clastic rocks accumulated with deposition of carbonates on a mesotrophic middle to outer shelf. In the Longtou region, carbonate deposition during marine transgression culminated with the precipitation of high-grade Mn deposits during maximum flooding. Mn ore horizons are composed of amalgamated alabandite-bearing rhodochrosite, Mn calcite, and braunite laminae. Mn carbonates have been largely interpreted as forming in oxic water columns via reduction of Mn oxides by organic matter. However, paragenetic relationships and δ13C values (similar to those of seawater) indicate the Mn carbonates of Longtou were formed during authigenesis by the emplacement of anoxic, Mn-rich water masses on the distal to middle shelf. Such anoxia is interpreted to have shut down the carbonate factory and diminished sedimentation, a prerequisite for the concentration and precipitation of Mn carbonates in pore water. This research supports the notion that areas of the Paleozoic deep ocean were persistently anoxic and periodically tapped by coastal upwelling to produce Mn- and Fe-rich deposits. Application of this emerging ore deposit model to other economically important carbonate-hosted Mn deposits may improve resource exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".