Effect of phosphorylation on the planar compaction of reinforcements made of unidirectional flax fibres supported by a thin flax fibre mat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transverse compaction of fibre reinforcements has significant importance in the production of complex dry fibre preforms for the resin transfer moulding (RTM) process of composite materials. This work investigates, for the first time, the planar compaction of phosphorylated stacks of unidirectional (UD) reinforcements made of flax yarns held together by a thin layer of short flax fibres. Planar compaction tests were carried out to evaluate the influence of temperature and humidity on the creep percentage, thickness recovery, and permanent deformation of UD reinforcements prepared with and without phosphorylation. It appears that the creep percentage and permanent deformation are more important for phosphorylated reinforcements than for untreated ones. Increasing the compaction temperature and humidity results in an increase of the creep and permanent deformation of phosphorylated fibres. The tensile strength of phosphorylated fibres‐reinforced composites is lower than that of untreated ones while there is no effect on the tensile modulus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".