MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164226412 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.657958

Deep Cross-User Models Reduce the Training Burden in Myoelectric Control

2021· article· en· W3164226412 on OpenAlexafffund
Evan Campbell, Angkoon Phinyomark, Erik Scheme

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceMachine learningLeverage (statistics)Subject-matter expertArtificial intelligenceAdaptation (eye)Artificial neural networkCross-validationProtocol (science)Expert system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effort, focus, and time to collect data and train EMG pattern recognition systems is one of the largest barriers to their widespread adoption in commercial applications. In addition to multiple repetitions of motions, including exemplars of confounding factors during the training protocol has been shown to be critical for robust machine learning models. This added training burden is prohibitive for most regular use cases, so cross-user models have been proposed that could leverage inter-repetition variability supplied by other users. Existing cross-user models have not yet achieved performance levels sufficient for commercialization and require users to closely adhere to a training protocol that is impractical without expert guidance. In this work, we extend a previously reported adaptive domain adversarial neural network (ADANN) to a cross-subject framework that requires very little training data from the end-user. We compare its performance to single-repetition within-user training and the previous state-of-the-art cross-subject technique, canonical correlation analysis (CCA). ADANN significantly outperformed CCA for both intact-limb (86.8-96.2%) and amputee (64.1-84.2%) populations. Moreover, the ADANN adaptation computation time was substantially lower than the time otherwise devoted to conducting a full within-subject training protocol. This study shows that cross-user models, enabled by deep-learned adaptations, may be a viable option for improved generalized pattern recognition-based myoelectric control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207