MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seafloor sediment supply of nutrient silicon on the Greenland margin

2020· article· en· W3164226644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hong Chin Ng, Lucie Cassarino, Rebecca A. Pickering, Malcolm Woodward, Samantha J. Hammond, Katharine Hendry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zoneBiogeochemical cycleOceanographySedimentBiogenic silicaNutrientEnvironmental scienceGeologySeafloor spreadingSeawaterDiatomEnvironmental chemistryChemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biogeochemical cycling of nutrient silicon (Si) in the northern high latitudes has received increasing attention over recent years. This is in large part due to the discovery of silicon limitation of diatoms over seasonal timescales, the potential role of melting glaciers in supplying a significant amount of this nutrient to the coastal ocean, and the rapid environmental changes the polar ocean is experiencing as a result of global climate warming. However, our understanding of the nutrient Si in the polar ocean is severely restricted by the lack of knowledge of the benthic Si cycling and its controlling processes, which is due to the limited number of seafloor observations in the region. In this study, we address this knowledge gap through the acquisition of sediment pore water profiles and the execution of incubation experiments on sediment cores collected from the Greenland continental margin and the Labrador Sea. Our results indicate a net (benthic) flux of dissolved silica (DSi) out of the sediment into the overlying seawater at the study sites. A new global compilation also reveals that benthic Si flux observed at our marginal sites are substantially higher than in the open ocean. This is likely because benthic flux in the open ocean is solely maintained by molecular diffusion along a concentration gradient, while there are additional processes: pore water advection and rapid dissolution of certain siliceous sponge groups, and other reactive silica phases, that contribute to the elevated benthic Si flux on the Greenland margin. This finding has important implications for existing evaluations of oceanic Si budgets, which have not accounted for any processes other than diffusion in the global estimation of benthic Si flux. Our results also suggest that strong benthic Si flux observed on the Greenland margin, combined with wind-driven coastal upwelling, could be a significant source of this nutrient to both the diverse (benthic) sponge communities and (planktonic) diatom productivity in the region. The magnitude of this benthic cycling could potentially rival the other continental inputs of Si in the northern high latitudes, as the first estimation of total benthic Si flux from the western Greenland shelf alone (0.04–0.27 Tmol year-1) is in the same order of magnitude as the total Si export from Greenland Ice Sheet (0.2 Tmol year-1) and the pan-Arctic rivers (0.35 Tmol year-1) respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207