MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W316422860

Positioning Women, Mental Health and Depression on Canadian Health Care Agendas

2008· article· en· W316422860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donna Marie Eansor

Bibliographic record

VenueForum on public policy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHysteriaNothingMental healthScholarshipPsychiatryLawPsychologyGender studiesCriminologyPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I'd had a miscarriage which caused me to have a breakdown. I didn't know it was a breakdown but I went to my doctor and explained how I felt. He said there was nothing he could do for me, he had all these patients to see and perhaps the nurse could get me a cup of tea ... (1) Pauline Lee 2004 Introduction Pauline's story echoes many women's stories in the twentieth century and is also representative of women's her story about mental health concerns. Herstorically, women with medical health issues have been pathologized and over-medicated or under--recognized, under-treated and undiagnosed. The root of this inequality is in the diagnosis of hysteria during the nineteenth century, which assumed that a uterus and ovaries put women at risk for nervous disorders. This flawed biological and scientific finding framed the mental health concerns of women as biological issues, matters of nature rather than issues about human rights and equality. As a result, women suffered inequality in every respect in society. Feminist scholarship has critiqued hysteria and with decades of lobbying has exposed hysteria for what it is; overt sexism and bad science. Women were denied basic rights on the basis of hysteria. (2) For example, under the law, women were not considered persons, did not have the right to vote or access to educational opportunities. A vision of equality, hard work and vigilance guided the Famous Five in 1929 to the highest court in Canada to legally transform women into persons with entitlement to fundamental equality rights. (3) These feminists and those who followed stood by their position for women's equality, even in the face of many losses, to gain the right to vote and access to educational opportunities for Canadian women. More recently, significant strides toward equality have gained inclusion of equality provisions in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (4); ratification of international agreements such as the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women s and the right to equal pay for work of equal value. There is doubt that there has been significant progress in achieving the notion of equality as a basic human right for Canadian women. At the same time, there is a very real danger that this progress had led many to think that we have achieved substantive equality for women in Canada. This no problem perception emanates from the partial fulfillment of the substantive equality for women and operates as a real obstacle to the identification of the unmet equality challenges that presently exist. Substantive equality for all women remains an unfinished agenda and the unequal treatment of women's mental health issues in Canada is an integral and critical component of this agenda. (6) Women and mental health issues are not on Canadian health care agendas. Pauline's story reveals that women continue to be under treated or not treated at all and thereby denied access to the appropriate health care services. A cup of tea has been touted as preventative for all sorts of medical problems (7) and there is some evidence that green tea helps with depression. (8) Even so, a cup of tea is an inadequate medical response and a denial to Pauline of the right health care services having regard to her experience in the circumstances of a breakdown. Whereas Pauline was under-treated and essentially left untreated, those women who are over-treated are equally denied appropriate health care services. A frequent choice of physicians and psychiatrists for women with mental health issues is the prescription of psychotropic drugs. Many women are over-medicated or placed on the wrong medication. Thirteen percent of women versus 9% of men consume these drugs and women are twice as likely as men to walk out of a doctor's office with a prescription for anti-anxiety or anti-depressive medication. (9) Moreover, little research has been conducted about how sex and gender differences affect the metabolism, overall efficacy and side effects of these medications over life courses. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0450.025
Scholarly communication0.0250.008
Open science0.0040.017
Research integrity0.0190.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum on public policySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207