PERANCANGAN DAN ANALISIS KELAYAKAN TEKNO EKONOMI PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK TENAGA SURYA ROOFTOP KAPASITAS 1215 WP DENGAN SISTEM ON GRID SKALA RUMAH TANGGA STUDI KASUS PERUMAHAN SAMBIROTO ASRI KOTA SEMARANG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Memanfaatkan atap rumah sebagai lahan pembangkit listrik tenaga surya sistem on grid bisa menjadi solusi yang efektif dan efisien untuk mengurangi tagihan listrik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang dan menganalisis potensi PLTS rooftop kapasitas 1215 Wp dengan sistem on grid skala rumah tangga dari sisi tekno ekonomi. Menggunakan masing-masing dua alternatif untuk komponen utama panel surya dan inverter maka terdapat 4 variasi rancangan konfigurasi komponen dalam penelitian ini. Variasi 1 menggunakan panel surya canadian solar dengan inverter solax. Variasi 2 menggunakan panel surya canadian solar dengan inverter sofar. Variasi 3 menggunakan panel surya risen dengan inverter solax. Variasi 4 menggunakan panel surya risen dengan inverter sofar. Melalui software PVSyst 6.43, dengan rata rata radiasi sebesar 5,48 kWh/m2/hari, potensi kinerja dari masing-masing variasi perancangan PLTS rooftop kapasitas 1215 Wp skala rumah tangga ini akan menghasilkan energi listrik sebesar 1873 kWh, 1893 kWh, 1865 kWh dan 1885 kWh. Biaya investasi dari perancangan PLTS rooftop kapasitas 1215 Wp adalah Rp25.220.000-Rp27.020.000 dengan nilai Net Present Value berkisar antara Rp15.309.805- Rp17.421.839, Benefit Cost Ratio berkisar antara 1,489-1,588, Payback period berkisar antara 10,38 – 11,02 tahun dan nilai IRR berkisar antara 8,8-9,56%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it