MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164284570 · doi:10.11159/rtese21.302

Adverse Effect of Direct Discharge of Hot Spring Tributaries into Rivers on Life Aquatic Ecosystems

2021· article· en· W3164284570 on OpenAlexaff
Yuly E. Sánchez, Mehrab Mehrvar, Lynda H. McCarthy, Édgar Quiñones-Bolaños, Luis Eduardo Rodríguez Cheu, Jairo Chacón

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Recent Trends in Environmental Science and Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributarySpring (device)Aquatic ecosystemEcosystemEnvironmental scienceFreshwater ecosystemHot springHydrology (agriculture)EcologyGeologyGeographyOceanographyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hot springs have traditionally been a tourist attraction in many parts of the world during the high season of tourism.Wastewater is usually discharged into streams without any treatment.This affect the quality of the receiving water, causing negative impacts to the aquatic ecosystems.There has been little research on the downstream ecological impacts of water discharges from various major recreational spa sites in different parts of the world, however, some studies suggest that sewage discharges from hot springs have adverse ecological effects on aquatic life.On the other hand, the mineral composition of hot springs derived mainly from groundwater is greater than that of stream water.There are models that simulate the effects of hot spring discharges into surface water sources.For example, some studies have found that wastewater discharges from hot springs have a significant adverse impact on water quality during periods of minimal flow.However, an important factor that must be taken into account is that it is estimated that the wastewater from the thermal waters contributes up to 50% of the effluents discharged into the receiving water, which may be the main reason for the significant negative impact of the hot springs over aquatic systems.Despite the negative consequences of the impacts on ecosystems derived from wastewater from hot springs, it is interesting to note that there are no regulations for the discharge of wastewater from hot springs.This may be due to the fact that the amount of effluent that is discharged into the receiving water is generally limited or because the importance of the mineral composition of the hot springs is small compared to that present in the wastewater discharges derived from anthropogenic activities.Therefore, it is necessary to advance in the investigation on the contamination of the waste waters coming from hot springs.The results of these investigations will surely contribute to the authorities increasing control over the use of hot springs and the discharge of their untreated waters [1-9].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Recent Trends in Environmental Science and EngineeringSame topicWater Resources and ManagementFrench-language works237,207