MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164299758 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.133

134 Rh sensitization: A 2-year Canadian National Surveillance Study

2019· article· en· W3164299758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jillian M. Baker, Douglas M. Campbell, Katerina Pavenski, Kathleen Hollamby, Thivia Jegathesan, Vinod K. Bhutani, Alvin Zipursky, Michael Sgro

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitizationMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rh sensitization occurs when women whose red blood cells are Rh(D)-antigen negative develop anti-Rh(D) antibodies either during a previous pregnancy in which the fetus is Rh(D) positive or by exposure to Rh antigens from blood products/transfusion. Neonates born to Rh-sensitized mothers may present with severe jaundice and anemia. Other outcomes may include death from acute or chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, or brain damage resulting from severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Rh disease is now considered rare in countries where Rh prophylaxis is used. In Canada the rate of Rh sensitization and neonatal Rh disease are unknown. Factors that may lead to continued Rh disease in Canada include the immigration of women from countries without universal Rh immunization programs. DESIGN/METHODS: The Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program was used to send a monthly questionnaire to all pediatricians in Canada to solicit cases of Rh sensitization for two years from May 2016-June 2018. The questionnaire was developed by our group with the case definition being: Any infant 60 days of age or less with Rh(D) sensitization and the Mother is Rh negative (D-negative), the Mother has positive antibody screen due to anti-D (maternal allo-anti-D, not passive anti-D from Rh(D) immunoglobulin), and the cord or infant blood group is Rh positive (D-positive). The complete protocol can be accessed at www.cpsp.cps.ca/surveillance. RESULTS: Fifty-seven cases of Rh(D) sensitization were reported across Canada between May 2016 and June 2018. The average gestational age of affected was 36.9 weeks (range: 35–40). At presentation, the average age was 6.7 hours, and the average hemoglobin was 135.27g/L (range: 33–200 g/L). The average peak micro bilirubin (MBR) level was 280 µmol/L (range: 67–771 µmol/L), and the average duration of phototherapy was 129 hours. Nearly half of the babies required either pack red blood cell transfusion, IVIG or both. Ten of the affected infants were reported as needing an exchange transfusion. Many of the affected mothers were born outside Canada. CONCLUSION: Though rare, Rh disease continues to exist in Canada. Despite current public health measures across the country, additional work must be done to raise awareness of Rh disease, to prevent the disease whenever possible, and to minimize sequelae when it does occur. The ongoing global burden of Rh Disease worldwide, as well as the possibility of emerging Rh immunoglobulin refusal are among factors that should be taken into consideration in future awareness and prevention efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207