MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164317999

L’île du Petit Mécatina sur la Basse-Côte-Nord du Québec. Résultats préliminaires des analyses céramiques d’un site voué aux activités de pêche saisonnière dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent entre le XVIe et le XVIIIe siècle

2011· article· fr· W3164317999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anja Herzog

Bibliographic record

VenuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2001, un nouveau site archéologique est découvert sur l’île du Petit Mécatina, sur la Basse-Côte-Nord du Québec. Il semble être associé à la présence de chasseurs de baleine basques dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent au XVIe siècle. Cependant, des pipes argileuses et des perles de verre retrouvées à Petit Mécatina indiquent une datation tardive du site (fin XVIIe et début XVIIIe siècle), ce qui ne concorde pas avec celle d’autres stations baleinières basques connues, car ces sites auraient été abandonnés vers le deuxième quart du XVIIe siècle. De plus, des dépôts subaquatiques d’ossements indiquent que les pêcheurs fréquentaient les lieux pour exploiter non seulement la baleine mais également la morue. L’analyse de la collection céramique de Petit Mécatina permet d’apporter des informations supplémentaires sur la période de fréquentation du site, l’origine des pêcheurs, la répartition de certaines activités sur les lieux et la distinction sociale perceptible à travers certains objets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)Same topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207