MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164326199 · doi:10.3386/w28838

Efficiency and Incidence of Taxation with Free Entry and Love-of-Variety Preferences

2021· preprint· en· W3164326199 on OpenAlexafffund
Kory Kroft, Jean‐William Laliberté, René Leal Vizcaíno, Matthew Notowidigdo

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaBooth School of Business, University of ChicagoUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)EconomicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a theory of commodity taxation with love-of-variety preferences and endogenous firm entry and exit. We consider a framework that encompasses a wide range of firm conduct and derive formulas for efficiency and pass-through of specific and ad valorem taxes. These formulas unify existing canonical ones in the literature and lead to novel economic insights for both welfare and incidence. We use them to derive a desirability condition for when ad valorem taxation is more efficient than specific taxation and a condition for when ad valorem taxation leads to greater pass-through than specific taxation. Finally, we consider an empirical application that illustrates how to estimate the key parameters of the tax formulas in a theoretically consistent way. Our results indicate that specific taxes are more efficient at the margin than ad valorem taxes and that product variety is below the socially optimal level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFrench-language works237,207