MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164338795 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2021.3084163

Random Access Based on Maximum Average Distance Code for Massive MTC in Cellular IoT Networks

2021· preprint· en· W3164338795 on OpenAlex
Carlos A. Astudillo, Ekram Hossain, Nelson L. S. da Fonseca

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRandom accessCode (set theory)Computer scienceDecoding methodsAmbiguityScheme (mathematics)Channel (broadcasting)InferenceAlgorithmComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Code-expanded Random Access (CeRA) is a promising technique for supporting massive machine-type communications in cellular IoT networks. However, its potentiality is limited by code ambiguity, which results from the inference of a larger number of codewords than those actually transmitted. In this letter, we propose a random access (RA) scheme to alleviate this problem by allowing devices to select the preambles to be transmitted considering a <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${q}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -ary code with maximum average distance. Moreover, a CeRA decoding approach based on hypergraphs is proposed and an analytical model is derived. Numerical results show that the proposed scheme significantly increases the probability of successful channel access as well as resource utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it