MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164386808 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.26.445816

Maximally predictive ensemble dynamics from data

2021· preprint· en· W3164386808 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Carlos Costa, Tosif Ahamed, David Jordan, Greg J. Stephens

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
FundersOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
KeywordsComputer scienceStatistical physicsOperator (biology)Parameterized complexityLeverage (statistics)Langevin dynamicsScalabilityAlgorithmArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We leverage the interplay between microscopic variability and macroscopic order to connect physical descriptions across scales directly from data, without underlying equations. We reconstruct a state space by concatenating measurements in time, building a maximum entropy partition of the resulting sequences, and choosing the sequence length to maximize predictive information. Trading non-linear trajectories for linear, ensemble evolution, we analyze reconstructed dynamics through transfer operators. The evolution is parameterized by a transition time τ : capturing the source entropy rate at small τ and revealing timescale separation with collective, coherent states through the operator spectrum at larger τ . Applicable to both deterministic and stochastic systems, we illustrate our approach through the Langevin dynamics of a particle in a double-well potential and the Lorenz system. Applied to the behavior of the nematode worm C. elegans , we derive a “run-and-pirouette” navigation strategy directly from posture dynamics. We demonstrate how sequences simulated from the ensemble evolution capture both fine scale posture dynamics and large scale effective diffusion in the worm’s centroid trajectories and introduce a top-down, operator-based clustering which reveals subtle subdivisions of the “run” behavior. POPULAR SUMMARY Complex structure is often composed from a limited set of relatively simple building blocks; such as novels from letters or proteins from amino acids. In musical composition, e.g., sounds and silences combine to form longer time scale structures; motifs form passages which in turn form movements. The challenge we address is how to identify collective variables which distinguish structures across such disparate time scales. We introduce a principled framework for learning effective descriptions directly from observations. Just as a musical piece transitions from one movement to the next, the collective dynamics we infer consists of transitions between macroscopic states, like jumps between metastable states in an effective potential landscape. The statistics of these transitions are captured compactly by transfer operators. These operators play a central role, guiding the construction of maximally-predictive short-time states from incomplete measurements and identifying collective modes via eigenvalue decomposition. We demonstrate our analysis in both stochastic and deterministic systems, and with an application to the movement dynamics of an entire organism, unravelling new insight in long time scale behavioral states directly from measurements of posture dynamics. We can, in principle, also make connections to both longer or shorter timescales. Microscopically, postural dynamics result from the fine scale interactions of actin and myosin in the muscles, and from electrical impulses in the brain and nervous system. Macroscopically, behavioral dynamics may be extended to longer time scales, to moods or dispositions, including changes during aging, or over generations due to ecological or evolutionary adaptation. The generality of our approach provides opportunity for insights on long term dynamics within a wide variety of complex systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207