MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164494725 · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000002955

Predictive variables for peripheral neuropathy in treated HIV type 1 infection revealed by machine learning

2021· article· en· W3164494725 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Tu, Erika Johnson, Esther Fujiwara, M. John Gill, Linglong Kong, Christopher Power

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionReceiver operating characteristicPeripheral neuropathyViral loadInternal medicineUnivariate analysisCohortArea under the curvePolyneuropathyDiabetes mellitusImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Multivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral neuropathies (PNPs) in HIV-infected patients are highly debilitating because of neuropathic pain and physical disabilities. We defined prevalence and associated predictive variables for PNP subtypes in a cohort of persons living with HIV. DESIGN: Adult persons living with HIV in clinical care were recruited to a longitudinal study examining neurological complications. METHODS: Each patient was assessed for symptoms and signs of PNP with demographic, laboratory, and clinical variables. Univariate, multiple logistic regression and machine learning analyses were performed by comparing patients with and without PNP. RESULTS: Three patient groups were identified: PNP (n = 111) that included HIV-associated distal sensory polyneuropathy (n = 90) or mononeuropathy (n = 21), and non-neuropathy (n = 408). Univariate analyses showed multiple variables differed significantly between the non-neuropathy and PNP groups including age, estimated HIV type 1 (HIV-1) duration, education, employment, neuropathic pain, peak viral load, polypharmacy, diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, AIDS, and prior neurotoxic nucleoside antiretroviral drug exposure. Classification algorithms distinguished those with PNP, all with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of more than 0.80. Random forest models showed greater accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values compared with the multiple logistic regression analysis. Relative importance plots showed that the foremost predictive variables of PNP were HIV-1 duration, peak plasma viral load, age, and low CD4+ T-cell levels. CONCLUSION: PNP in HIV-1 infection remains common affecting 21.4% of patients in care. Machine-learning models uncovered variables related to PNP that were undetected by conventional analyses, emphasizing the importance of statistical algorithmic approaches to understanding complex neurological syndromes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIDSSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207