MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164528035 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12716

Androgen replacement therapy for cancer‐related symptoms in male: result of prospective randomized trial (ARTFORM study)

2021· article· en· W3164528035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kouji Izumi, Hiroaki Iwamoto, Hiroshi Yaegashi, Takahiro Nohara, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Yoshifumi Kadono, Shigeki Nanjo, Tadaaki Yamada, Koshiro Ohtsubo, Seiji Yano, Atsushi Mizokami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTestosterone (patch)CachexiaRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineAndrogenAndrogen deficiencyProspective cohort studyCancerAnorexiaQuality of life (healthcare)EndocrinologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypogonadism associated with cancer is reported to cause cachexia and a variety of physical and psychological symptoms. This study aims to evaluate whether androgen replacement therapy can improve cancer-related symptoms in male advanced cancer patients. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, and randomized controlled study was conducted. Patients with low serum testosterone levels (total or free testosterone levels were <2.31 ng/mL or <11.8 pg/mL, respectively) were randomly assigned to the control or testosterone enanthate administration (testosterone group) groups. Testosterone enanthate was injected into the muscle tissue at a dose of 250 mg every 4 weeks (baseline, week 4, and week 8). Differences in quality of life questionnaires and cachexia-related serum protein levels between groups were assessed. RESULTS: This study enrolled and randomized 106 and 81 patients, respectively. Moreover, 41 and 40 patients were in the control and testosterone groups, respectively. Although no significant differences in the change of subscales and total scores in Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment were noted from the baseline between the two groups, the testosterone group showed a significantly better change in the 'unhappiness' item of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System at week 12 compared with baseline versus the control group (-1.4 and 0.0 points, respectively; mean, P = 0.007). No significant differences exist in the change of serum interleukin-6 and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels at week 12 from the baseline between the control and testosterone groups. Consequently, the testosterone group significantly inhibited the change in serum tumour necrotic factor-α level at week 12 from the baseline compared with the control group (+0.4 and +0.1 pg/mL, respectively; mean, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Although testosterone enanthate did not improve most of the items in health-related quality of life questionnaires, testosterone enanthate induced a significantly better change in the 'unhappiness' item at week 12 compared with the control. Testosterone enanthate may be a potential treatment option for male advanced cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and MuscleSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207